What Constitutes the True Remnant Church?

There are many things which constitute the True Remnant Church, but limiting it to a membership within the confines of the General Conference is not one of them. To prove this let’s go to the very credible source of the book of Revelations. After all, doesn’t the book the Revelation of Jesus Christ define the Remnant Church? Revelation 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. So the Bible defines the Remnant Church as keeping the commandments of God and having the testimony of Jesus Christ, but nowhere in the book of the Revelation nor in any book of the Bible does it define the Church as being confined to a membership within the General Conference. Let’s take another look at the book of Revelations to get some more insight about how things can be legitimately defined. Revelation 22:18-19 18 If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy … Continued

Daniel and the Revelation Fingers Turkey as King of the North

In several of her writings Ellen White said that the book Daniel and the Revelation was truth. She even went as far as to say that God used the author of Daniel and the Revelation to communicate light and direct minds to the truth. Now if Mrs. White had instructed us that God, yes, even GOD had used this author, Uriah Smith, to communicate light and truth for the modern times, then how can we doubt that it was truth, or that the figures as explained in the book could be mistaken? She even said that, “The interest in Daniel and the Revelation is to continue as long as probationary time shall last.” Keep in mind that the discussion pertaining to the modern day present truth identification of the King of the North in the book Daniel and the Revelations is contained in between the pages starting from the last paragraph on page 280 and ending on page 293. In those pages you will find that the King of the North is clearly defined as Turkey. 1MR 62.3 God desires the light found in the books of Daniel and Revelation to be presented in clear lines. It is painful to think of the many cheap theories picked up and presented to the people by ignorant, unprepared teachers. Those who present … Continued

The king of the North Cannot be the Papacy!

Ellen White was in agreement with all the founding fathers who taught that Turkey (formerly known as the Ottoman Empire) was or is the King of the North, The teaching that the King of the North was the Papacy came about after both Ellen White and Uriah Smith (Author of Thoughts on Daniel and Revelation) had passed away. Nevertheless, the book of Daniel itself and Thessalonians 2:8 clearly affirm that the Papacy cannot be the King of the North. In addition there are several quotes by Ellen White which insist that she also supported the teaching that Turkey is the King of the North as “truth.” But if Daniel clearly establishes this “truth,” (as E.G. White referred to it) then why should we need look any further? Hence the following paragraphs will present why the King of the North cannot be the Papacey according to Daniel 11:45 – 12:1. Let’s take a look at Daniel 11: 44 & 45 Daniel 11:44-45 44 But tidings out of the east and out of the north shall trouble him: therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many. 45 And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall … Continued

The Eastern Question

This is the download link to the true unaltered 1897 version Daniel and the Revelation by Uriah Smith.